| Dr. Janet
L. Gehring
Assistant Professor of Biology Bradley University |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Silene latifolia (female) | Silene latifolia (male) |
| Home | Courses | Research | Curriculum Vitae |
My research is broadly concerned with how genetics and ecology interact to determine the evolutionary responses of plants to their environments. My research interests are focused on three areas within this broad field of study: 1) evolution of life-history traits, 2) evolutionary ecology of plant reproduction, especially the evolution and maintenance of breeding systems and sexual dimorphism, and 3) spatial patterns of genetic variation, both within-populations and over larger spatial scales. The questions addressed in my research program require field or greenhouse observations, often complimented by laboratory studies utilizing genetic markers. Currently my research is centered on two projects: sexual dimorphism in the dioecious Silene latifolia and the population genetics and evolutionary ecology of reproduction in Gentiana puberulenta.
Silene latifolia project
Most plants are bisexual and have both male and female
function within the same individual, usually within the same flower. In
about 7.6% of plant species, there are separate male and female individuals
(dioecy). Although uncommon, dioecy has evolved independently in many plant
families. Following separation of male and female function into distinct
individuals, there is likely to be divergent selection resulting from differences
in how males and female attain reproductive success. That is, reproduction
becomes specialized (as it is in most animals). For example, females may
be selected to maximize resource capture, since female reproductive success
is often thought to be limited by resource availability. In another example,
male-male competition for pollinators may cause selection for large flowers
or floral displays, since male reproductive success is often thought to
be limited by access to mates. Presently, we are documenting how the sexually
dimorphic traits of S. latifolia (such as the intersexual
difference in flower size seen in the photographs at the top of this page)
are genetically correlated, both between traits and between sexes. We hypothesize
that genes controlling flower size and number may affect the degree of
sexual dimorphism in many other phenotypic traits of S. latifolia.
Gentiana puberulenta project
The once extensive North American tallgrass prairie has
undergone severe habitat destruction and fragmentation because of its suitability
for agriculture. The transformation of the tallgrass prairie into a relatively
few, small remnants means that typical prairie species such as Gentianapuberulenta
are found primarily in small, isolated populations surrounded by many square
miles of row crops. These small isolated populations may experience 1)
loss of genetic variation due to genetic drift, 2) higher rates of inbreeding,
concomitantly decreasing heterozygosity and increasing inbreeding depression,
and 3) absence of gene flow between populations. In collaboration with
several Bradley undergraduates, my research lab is addressing the following
questions regarding G. puberulenta. 1) Is percent seed germination
low because of inbreeding depression and/or limited within-population genetic
variation? 2) Is within-population genetic variation correlated with population
size and/or remnant size? 3) Do spatial patterns of genetic structure vary
among differently shaped prairie remnants? 4) Is G. puberulenta
self-compatible? 5) Can G. puberulenta hybridize with Gentianaalba
in restored prairies?
Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)
My REU students in both 1999 and 2000 focused on identifying
genetic markers in G. puberulenta that would allow us to
study its population genetics. In 1999, Nichole French (below right) resolved
and identified several polymorphic protein isozymes. In 2000, Felice Kelly
(below left) successfully established a DNA extraction procedure and was
moderately successful in using coffee microsatellite primers with Gentianapuberulenta.
![]() |
![]() |
| This page last modified on September 3, 2000. | 1480 visits since 02/19/02. |