A correct solution, arrived at by means of numerical simulation, was
received from Philippe Fondanaiche.
With 27 cards you are guaranteed a three-of-a-kind.
Twenty-six cards could consist of 13 pairs of cards, but the next card
drawn will necessarily complete a trio.
The second part of the problem is more difficult. You
will have less that a 50% chance to have a trio with 13 cards,
and more than a 50% chance with 14 cards.
Let p(k) denote the probability that you have a
trio after drawing k cards. Obviously
p(2) = 0 while we just saw that
p(27) = 1 and it's clear that this probability
increases as you draw more cards.
What is the smallest value of k for which 1/2
£ p(k)?
The function p is given by the following equation:
where ëk/2
û means k/2 rounded down to the
nearest integer, and
is the number of ways to choose t things from a
set of s objects. A graph of the function appears
below.
You can see that 14 cards will be the smallest number
for which a probability of a trio is greater than 1/2.
Where does the function come from? Let's start with
the numerator of the fraction; I'll argue it counts the number of ways
to choose k cards from a standard deck of 52 cards so that no
trio is drawn. Now, each such choice will contain either no pair,
one pair, two pair, and so on, with
ë
k/2û
being the largest number of pairs which can come up. The summands
count the number of ways in which k cards can be chosen with exactly
i pairs appearing: first select which of the thirteen faces are
to be paired, then select the pair from within the four cards of that face;
the other cards must be unpaired, so from the 13 - i
remaining faces, choose k - 2i faces, and then one
card from each face. The fraction, then, is the probability of
choosing k cards from the deck and failing to get a trio.
Subtracting from one gives the desired probablity.
You are visitor number
3107
to this page.
Page last updated 1 November 2000.